Jammu: Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah on Monday expressed support for the ongoing protests across India against the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, describing the agitation as “understandable” given the perception that a particular religion is being unfairly targeted.
“Charitable activities are part of all religions, and Muslims conduct these through Waqf. When one community feels singled out, it naturally leads to unrest,” Abdullah told reporters outside the Assembly.
Nationwide Protests Planned by AIMPLB
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has announced a nationwide agitation against the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, with large-scale sit-ins planned in front of the state assemblies in Patna and Vijayawada on 26 and 29 March, respectively, as part of the first phase of the protest.
Parliamentary Panel’s Report and Controversy
The Waqf (Amendment) Bill was referred to a 31-member joint parliamentary committee on 8 August last year after its introduction in the Lok Sabha by Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju. The committee submitted its 655-page report to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on 30 January.
The report, adopted by a 15-11 majority vote, included several amendments proposed by members of the ruling BJP. However, opposition members strongly disagreed with the findings and submitted dissent notes, accusing the government of attempting to undermine Waqf boards.
Concerns Over Passage During Budget Session
Although the Bill is yet to be listed for debate, there is growing speculation that the government may push for its passage during the ongoing Budget session.
The protests reflect broader concerns within the Muslim community that the amendments could diminish the autonomy of Waqf boards, which manage charitable and religious properties. Opposition leaders have criticised the government’s approach, alleging that the proposed changes threaten the very existence of these institutions.
As tensions simmer, political analysts believe that the government’s handling of the Bill will have far-reaching implications, not only for community relations but also for the broader political landscape.
